Return
to Table of Contents
003
SUSTAINED ANTIHYPERTENSIVE ACTIVITY OF TELMISARTAN VS VALSARTAN ON AMBULATORY
BLOOD PRESSURE
Y Lacourciere, L Poirier, JM Krzesinski, WB White, G Davidai,
L Oostvogel, H Schumacher
Quebec City, Quebec; Liege, Belgium; Farmington, Connecticut, USA
OBJECTIVE: Early-morning BP surge and 24-h mean BP are linked to target-organ damage and cardiovascular events. The objective was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan vs valsartan in the last 6 h of the dosing interval and after a missed dose.
DESIGN AND METHODS: Hypertensive patients (seated cuff DBP 95-109 mmHg, 24-h mean DBP
RESULTS: Data from the 2 trials were combined as prospectively planned. After active therapy, last 6-h mean DBP was reduced by 7.6±7.9 mmHg from 88.1±8.1 mmHg with telmisartan (n=447) vs 5.8±7.8 mmHg from 87.1±7.5 mmHg with valsartan (n=430) (p=0.0044, adjusted for baseline, study, and treatment-by-study interaction). After the missed dose, 24-h mean DBP was reduced by 7.2±6.5 mmHg from 93.4±6.2 mmHg with telmisartan (n=437) vs 5.5±6.2 mmHg from 92.8±5.8 mmHg with valsartan (n=431) (p=0.0004). Absence of treatment-by-study interaction indicates that pooling of trial data is appropriate. All 24 hourly mean reductions with telmisartan were greater than with valsartan. Both treatments were equally well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: DBP reduction in the last 6 h of the once-daily dosing interval and 24-h mean DBP control when a dose is missed are significantly superior with telmisartan than with valsartan. Thus, telmisartan due to its longer half-life offers more sustained BP control, especially at the end of the dosing period and provides sustained efficacy in poorly compliant patients.
DC