HOME
Return to Table of Contents
248 CHARACTERIZATION OF IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME USING COLORECTAL DISTENSION AND BARORECEPTOR SENSITIVITY R Spaziani, K Redmond, A Bayati*, H Larsson*, SM Collins, MV Kamath Lack of disease specific biomarkers in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) has made its management difficult. Assessment of autonomic nervous system (ANS) by baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS; change in R-R/change in BP) has identified low BRS in IBS suggesting vagal dysfunction.
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; *AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden
AIMS: To develop a novel classification method to characterize IBS based on colorectal distension (CRD) studies and BRS.
METHODS: After a 20-min baseline, a barostat-controlled rectal bag (max. volume 863 mL) was distended (0.5 mmHg/s), to a max pressure of 70 mmHg, or 50% discomfort (whichever came first), and maintained in this tonic state for 3 mins. A 20-min recovery period was recorded. BRS was computed during baseline, tonic, and recovery periods using 3 or more increasing sequences within continuous HR and systolic BP time series. Group means were compared using Student's t-test. A sensitivity index (SI) was developed using CRD variables and cluster analysis (Spotfire® Decision siteTM 8.1.1).
RESULTS: 98 healthy volunteers (HV; 34±12 yrs, 52F) and 38 IBS patients (39±11 yrs, 35F) were studied. Three CRD variables (discomfort threshold pressure, max pressure, and max discomfort response) clustered subjects into 3 groups: HS (Hypersensitive), NS (Normosensitive), hS (hyposensitive). 22 HS-HV (27±8 yrs, 10F) and 10 HS-IBS (38±9 yrs, 10F), 35 NS-HV (31±11 yrs, 19F) and 12 NS-IBS (35±13 yrs, 9F), 17 hS-HV (42±11 yrs, 10F) and 0 hS-IBS subjects were characterized.
| Table: BRS and SI | ||||||
| Control BRS Base | Control BRS Tonic | Control BRS Post | Patient BRS Base | Patient BRS Tonic | Patient BRS Post | |
| HS | 12.12±2.36 | 9.39±2.66** | 11.95±2.58 | 7.63±2.23* | 7.19±2.17 | 7.31±2.17* |
| NS | 9.89±2.49§ | 8.19±2.23** | 10.89±2.43 | 9.38±2.47 | 6.70±2.58** | 9.43±2.46*,§ |
| hS | 7.53±2.25§,§§ | 6.45±2.52§,§§ | 7.48±2.44§,§§ | |||
| **p<0.05 vs. baseline; §p<0.05 vs. HS, §§p<0.05 vs. NS , *p<0.05 vs. HV | ||||||