Updating the evidence-base for suctioning adult patients: A systematic review
TJ Overend, CM Anderson, D Brooks, L Cicutto, M Keim, D McAuslan, M Nonoyama
OBJECTIVES: To update a previous clinical practice guideline on suctioning
in adult patients, published in the Canadian Respiratory Journal in
2001.
METHODS: A primary search of the MEDLINE (from 1998), CINAHL,
EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (all from 1996) databases up to
November 2007, was conducted. These dates reflect the search limits
reached in the previous clinical practice guideline. A secondary search of
the reference lists of retrieved articles was also performed. Two reviewers
independently appraised each study before meeting to reach consensus.
Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad and PEDro scales. When sufficient
data were available, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random
effects model. Data are reported as ORs, weighted mean differences and 95%
CIs. When no comparisons were possible, qualitative analyses of the data
were completed.
RESULTS: Eighty-one studies were critically appraised from a pool of
123. A total of 28 randomized controlled trials or randomized crossover
studies were accepted for inclusion. Meta-analysis was possible for open
versus closed suctioning only. Recommendations from 2001 with respect
to hyperoxygenation, hyperinflation, use of a ventilator circuit adaptor
and subglottic suctioning were confirmed. New evidence was identified
with respect to indications for suctioning, open suction versus closed suction
systems, use of medications and infection control.
CONCLUSIONS: While new evidence continues to be varied in
strength, and is still lacking in some areas of suctioning practice, the evidence
base has improved since 2001. Members of the health care team
should incorporate this evidence into their practice.
|