Is a pan-Canadian early child development system possible? Yes, when we redress what ails Canadian culture , Pulsus Group Inc
       
  Pulsus Group Inc. The Medical Peer Review Publisher
                                                                                                                       
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Search Paediatrics & Child Health
Search    
Advanced Search CONSUMER SITE
PROFESSIONAL SITE
 
 
 
 
PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH
Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS)
                                                                                   
                                                                                   
                                                                                   
 
   Home   
   Current Issue   
   Past Issues   
   Guidelines   
   Supplements   
   Submit Manuscript   
   Calendar   
   Links   
 
 
 
Return to TOC
   PDF / Free   
 
Original Articles December 2009, Volume 14 Issue 10: 685-688
 
Is a pan-Canadian early child development system possible? Yes, when we redress what ails Canadian culture
P Kershaw, L Anderson

Canada lags behind other countries when it comes to investing in families with children. Canada, therefore, fails to promote health by not optimizing early development. The authors diagnose the Canadian failure. The problem is not research or fiscal capacity, but rather a sickness in Canadian culture. Four ailments are identified: Canadians are convinced they cannot afford new social investments, tend to treat illness rather than promote health, ignore that good family policy requires gender equality, and discount intergenerational justice. In response, the authors propose four policy solutions. Their pan-Canadian framework would cost $22 billion annually, not even one-half of current elderly and pension benefits. The new investment would reduce child vulnerability from approximately 30% to just 10% of children within 10 years. This reduction in early vulnerability would increase gross domestic product 20% more over 60 years than if Canadians tolerate the status quo.

   Français        E-Mail This Abstract To A Colleague
            Click here to download free Adobe PDF Reader
 
 
 
 
  Log in
  Register
  Survey
  Shopping Cart
Copyright © Pulsus Group Inc