The effectiveness of the medication error review process at a tertiary pediatric hospital, Pulsus Group Inc
       
  Pulsus Group Inc. The Medical Peer Review Publisher
                                                                                                                       
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Search Canadian Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Search    
Advanced Search CONSUMER SITE
PROFESSIONAL SITE
 
 
 
 
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
                                           
                                           
                                           
 
       Home       
       Past Issues       
       Supplements       
       Links       
 
 
 
Return to TOC
   PDF / Free   
 
Drug Safety Summer 1997, Volume 4 Issue 2: 75-78
 
The effectiveness of the medication error review process at a tertiary pediatric hospital
C Rowe, G Koren

BACKGROUND: Medication errors, common in pediatric medicine, have the potential for serious morbidity and mortality. A common reason for this iatrogenia is miscalculation due to decimal point errors and erroneous computation. A previous study from the authors' institution showed that a subgroup of medical trainees commit 10-fold computational errors that are likely to be life-threatening in the pediatric population. For this subgroup especially, a mechanism needs to catch these errors before they reach the patient.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the medication error review process is working effectively in correcting drug errors.

SETTING: A tertiary pediatric hospital in Toronto, Ontario.

METHODS: Medication incident reports filed between October 1, 1994 and June 30, 1995 were reviewed for actual and potential (ie, intercepted) errors. RESULTS: An average of 73 medication reports were filed each month; the majority were actual errors. Only 48% of these were reviewed by the appropriate staff physician. Nurses were responsible for 77% of these errors, pharmacists 12% and physicians 11%. The rates of appropriate review and remedial action for nurses and pharmacists were 76% and 87%, respectively. For physicians, it was significantly lower at 38% (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: The medication error review process is not functioning effectively on either the initial staff review or remedication. These flaws may explain the lack of improvement in rates of medication errors.


   Français        E-Mail This Abstract To A Colleague
            Click here to download free Adobe PDF Reader
 
 
 
 
  Log in
  Register
  Survey
  Shopping Cart
Copyright © Pulsus Group Inc