Results following valve replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation, Pulsus Group Inc
       
  Pulsus Group Inc. The Medical Peer Review Publisher
                                                                                                                       
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
  Search The Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Search    
Advanced Search CONSUMER SITE
PROFESSIONAL SITE
 
 
 
 
THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS)
                                                                                   
                                                                                   
                                                                                   
 
   Home   
   Current Issue   
   Past Issues   
   Guidelines   
   Supplements   
   Submit Manuscript   
   Calendar   
   Links   
 
 
 
Return to Search Results
   PDF / Free   
 
Clinical Studies April 2001, Volume 17 Issue 4: 427-431
 
Results following valve replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation
D Bouchard, M Pellerin, M Carrier, LP Perault, P Page, Y Hebert, R Cartier, I Dyrda, LC Pelletier

BACKGROUND: Although several authors have favoured mitral repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), mitral valve replacement is a valuable option and most often a necessity in patients with structural IMR.

OBJECTIVE: To review the authors' experience with valve replacement for patients with acute and chronic IMR. The effect of preserving the valve leaflets and the subvalvular apparatus during replacement was also evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors' experience with mitral valve replacement for IMR between 1990 and 1999 was retrospectively analyzed at the Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec. Results obtained with mitral valve replacement due to degenerative disease were used for comparative purposes.

RESULTS: Ninety-two patients with IMR and 213 patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation underwent valve replacement with mechanical prostheses (262 of 305 [86%]) or biological prostheses (43 of 305 [14%]). Fifteen patients (15 of 92 [16%]) died within 30 days of mitral valve replacement among IMR patients compared with eight (eight of 213 [4%)] among patients with degenerative mitral valve disease (P=0.01). The seven-year survival average following mitral valve replacement was 66±7% in patients with ischemic disease compared with 72±4% in patients with degenerative disease (P=0.07). Cardiopulmonary bypass time (odds ratio [OR] 1.01) and emergency operation (OR 2.5) were correlated with the 30-day mortality; the patient's age (OR 1.04) was the only risk factor correlated with the seven-year mortality after valve replacement. The five-year survival of patients with papillary muscle rupture averaged 59±12% compared with 78±7% in those with functional IMR.

CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative risk factors and higher early mortality in patients with mitral valve replacement for ischemic disease contribute to a lower seven-year survival than with mitral valve surgery for degenerative disease. The short and long term survival of the patients in the acute structural mitral disease subgroup was significantly worse.


   Français        E-Mail This Abstract To A Colleague
            Click here to download free Adobe PDF Reader
 
 
 
 
  Log in
  Register
  Survey
  Shopping Cart
Copyright © Pulsus Group Inc