Characterization of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in Canada in 2005, Pulsus Group Inc
CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
The Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Canadian Respiratory Health Professionals Canadian Critical Care Society (CCCS)

Note: (Optional)

Citation Builder

  •  
Return to Table of Contents
 
Original Articles March 2007, Volume 14 Issue 2: 87-92
 

Characterization of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in Canada in 2005

D Brooks | R Sottana | B Bell | M Hanna | L Laframboise | S Selvanayagarajah | R Goldstein

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recognized as the prevailing standard of care for patients with chronic respiratory conditions. National surveys of PR programs provide important information regarding the structure, content and organization of these programs.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a national survey to characterize adult PR across Canada, in terms of program distribution, utilization, content and outcome measures.
METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study in which questionnaires were mailed to PR programs connected with hospitals or identified through the Canadian Lung Association was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 98 PR programs identified, over 90% of patients in the programs had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and 57% of the programs were outpatient. Inpatient programs accounted for only 10% of the total. The main program components included supervised lower extremity strength (77%), cycle (72%) and treadmill (70%) training, education (75%) and breathing retraining (68%). Over 80% of patients completed their programs and 90% of patients were enrolled in a follow-up component. Physical therapists, dieticians, respiratory therapists and respirologists were the most commonly identified health care providers. The most commonly used outcome measures were the 6 min walk test and disease-specific quality of life questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: There were similarities in program format, content, staffing, follow-up and funding among Canadian PR programs. The marked shortfall between the national PR capacity and the prevalence of COPD meant that only 1.2% of the COPD population had access to PR.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Prevalence survey | Pulmonary rehabilitation
   Français   
          
Click to download PDF Reader
 
 




Copyright © Pulsus Group Inc.