Previous Page  14 / 21 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 14 / 21 Next Page
Page Background

Page 57

Volume 1, Issue 1

Journal of General Dentistry

Euro Dental Market 2017

December 07-08, 2017

DENTAL MARKETING

December 07-08, 2017 | Madrid, Spain

27

th

Global Summit and Expo on

Comparative study between intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and pure conservation in management of

condylar head fracture in children

Hamada Mahran

Faculty of Dentistry Alexandria, Egypt

Background

: The purpose of the present study was to compare intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and pure conservation in the

management of condylar head fracture in children treated at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut

University, Egypt, from 2011-2016.

Methods

: 24 patients with condylar head fractures were included in this study; 10 males and 14 females in between the ages ranging

from 5-15 years. They were divided into two equal groups Patients in group 1, were treated by closed reduction for 2-3 weeks followed

by physiotherapy, while group 2 patients were managed by pure conservation only for the same period. Outcome results on clinical

and radiological parameters were evaluated during the follow up period.

Results

: In group 1, the maximum mouth opening after 2 months ranged from 28-36 mm (average 32 mm), while development of

ankylosis were reported in 3 patients. In group 2, the maximum interincisal opening ranged from 28-37 mm (average 32.5 mm) with

absence of ankylosis. Pain in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) was noted in 3 cases of bilateral condylar head fractures of this group,

but subsided gradually during the follow up.

Conclusions

: This study concluded that treatment of patients by closed reduction gives satisfactory clinical results, though the condyle

is not anatomically normal in radiographs, whereas management of patients by pure conservation without any surgical intervention

showed excellent results clinically as well as radiographically. Perhaps a study conducted on larger number of patients with longer

post operative follow up will throw more light on this subject.

dr.h.mahran@gmail.com

Journal of General Dentistry 2017, 1:1