44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Journal of Heart Research

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

The Proof and Reasons that Starling’s Law for the Capillary-Interstitial Fluid Transfer is Wrong: Advancing the Hydrodynamics of a Porous Orifice (g) Tube as the Real Mechanism

Author(s): Khaled A Ghanem and Ahmed N Ghanem

In 1886, oscine projected a hypothesis for the capillary–interstitial fluid (ISF) transfer, during which the capillary was thought a tube of a consistent diameter that’s rubberized to plasma proteins. The flow of fluid across its wall was thought dependent upon a balance between the hydrostatic pressure at intervals its lumen inflicting ‘filtration’, and also the pressure level of plasma proteins inflicting ‘absorption’. The physical basis on that disk of a capillary was thought positive and chargeable for filtration was Poiseuille’s work on long Brass tubes of uniform diameters. Later discoveries incontestible that the capillary could be a porous opening tube with entirely completely different fluid mechanics that’s rumoured here.


PDF
 
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1023

Journal of Heart Research received 1023 citations as per Google Scholar report

pulsus-health-tech
Top