44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Effect of different implant numbers and locations on strains around implants retaining mandibular overdentures with locator attachments. An in vitro strain gauge analysis

32nd International Conference on DENTISTRY

December 12, 2022 | Webinar

Mona Galal

Modern University of Technology and Information, Egypt

ScientificTracks Abstracts: Dentist Case Rep

Abstract :

Aim: This in vitro study was performed to evaluate the effect of different implant numbers and locations on strains around implants retaining mandibular overdentures with locator attachments. Materials and methods: Five implants were inserted in the interforaminal area of mandibular edentulous acrylic model in the following locations; 1) one in midline areas, 2 in canine areas and 2 in premolar areas. Locator attachments were used to connect mandibular experimental overdentures (n=5) to the implants. Two linear strain gauges were bonded at buccal and lingual surface of each implant. According to the implant number and location of the implants, the strain was measured (during unilateral and bilateral loading) using the following implant overdenture designs: Group 1: strains were measured around mid-line implant only, while the other locator attachments were disconnected. Group 2: strains were measured around the 2 canine implants only. Group 3: strains were measured around the 2 premolar implants only, Group 4: strains were measured around the midline and the 2 canine implants only, Group 5: strains were measured around the midline and the 2 premolar implants only. Results: For midline implants during bilateral and unilateral loading, the highest strains were noted with group 1 and group 5, and the lowest strain was noted with group 4. For distal implants during bilateral loading, the highest to the lowest were group 3> group 2> group 4> group 5. For distal implants on the loading and non-loading sides during unilateral loading, the highest to the lowest were group 3> group 2> group 5> group 4. For group, 4 and 5, midline implants recorded the highest strain, then distal implants on the loading sides, and the lowest strains were observed on the distal implants of the non-loading sides. Recent Publications 1. Aboelez MA, Elezz MGA, Abdraboh AE, Elsyad MA. Angled ball and locator attachments for immediate loaded inclined implants used to retain maxillary overdentures: A cross over study of patient satisfaction andoral health related quality of life. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2022;1‐10. 2. Mona Galal Abo El-Ezz, Effect of Different Implant Numbers and Locations On Strains Around Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdentures With Locator Attachments. An In vitro Strain Gauge Analysis, Edj,Vol.68 ,No.3 3. Mona Galal Mahmoud 1 (2019) Radiographic Evaluation Of Trabecular Metal Dental Implant (Tantlum) In Implant Retained Madibular Over Denture Cases”. Ain Shams University Journal.

Biography :

Mona Galal is an Ain Shams University graduate in 2006, a PHD degree holder in Prosthesis and Dental Implants from Ain Shams University since 2019, a current lecturer of prosthodontics at MTI University, and the founder of Diamond Clinic, ranks among Cairo’s top dentists, and her clinic is widely regarded as one of the best. Dr. Mona has been treating satisfied clients, creating countless smiles, and leading an expert team at her prestigious clinic for over 16 years

 
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 232

Dentistry: Case Report received 232 citations as per Google Scholar report

Dentistry: Case Report peer review process verified at publons
pulsus-health-tech
Top