All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
International Journal of Anatomical Variations

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Sebastien Barfoot and S. Ali Mirjalili*
 
Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand, Email: [email protected]
 
*Correspondence: S. Ali Mirjalili, Department of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand, Tel: +64-9-3737599, Email: [email protected]

Received Date: Jul 18, 2019 / Accepted Date: Oct 22, 2019 / Published Date: Oct 29, 2019

Citation: Barfoot S, Mirjalili AS. Case study: New evidence of a piriformis variant inserting onto the hip joint capsule. Int J Anat Var. 2019;12(4): 050-051.

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact [email protected]

Abstract

In this case study we present new evidence of a piriformis muscle variant inserting onto the hip joint capsule similar to that described by Tubbs and Salter. The variant was also atypical in that it originated medial to the first anterior sacral foramina and therefore obscured the union of the S1 nerve root and lumbosacral trunk. We believe this is the first instance that this variant has been noted.

Keywords

Piriformis; Anatomical variation; Hip joint

Case Study

During dissection of an elderly, male, Caucasian cadaver, a muscular variant of what we assume to be the piriformis was discovered bilaterally originating from the anterior surface of the sacrum, medial to the anterior sacral foramina, and extending laterally towards the greater sciatic foramen (GSF). The muscle was far better developed on the right side, with the left-sided muscle consisting of fewer muscular bundles more interspersed with fat and lacking a distinct distal tendinous insertion point. Bilateral appearance of the muscle is important to note as the cadaver suffered right-sided congenital cranial hemi-hypertrophy and so presence of this variant on the left indicates that its presence is not related to this condition. Both muscles originated medial to the first anterior sacral foramen on the bodies of S1 and S2, laying anterior to the S1 nerve root and obscuring the union of the lumbosacral trunk with the S1 root after the former descended across the pelvic brim (Figure 1). Some fibres were noted bridging across the second anterior sacral foramen to join the piriformis muscle below, slightly obscuring the S2 nerve root origin. On the right side a distal, flattened tendon was identified upon gluteal dissection, measuring 6-7mm wide. The tendon exited the GSF in an antero-inferior direction, tight to the bone and anterior to the sciatic nerve, then curved anteriorly against the ischium and passed deep to the piriformis, gemelli and obturator internus tendons before fanning out to insert on the posterior hip joint capsule (Figure 2). No precise nervous innervation could be confirmed for either muscle. Furthermore, the piriformis muscles were bilaterally atypical in that their origin was shorter than expected; instead of originating as three digitations spanning S2-4 vertebrae [1] they originated from only two digitations on S3-4, beginning their proximal attachment below the second anterior sacral foramen instead of the first. The distal tendinous insertion was otherwise normal on both sides. We are led to believe that the variant muscle observed here represents a portion of piriformis that has developed erroneously from the superior portion of the muscle’s embryological anlage, as evidenced by the loss the superior aspect of the normal piriformis muscle mass [2]. A duplicated superior gemellus was also noted on the left side similar to that described by Arifoglu et al [3].

journal-anatomical-variations-variant-muscle-lumbosacral

Figure 1: Variant muscle (white arrows showing superior edge) located on right hand side with lumbosacral trunk (LST) passing posteriorly and the inferior gluteal vessels (IGv) passing anteriorly. The origin of the S1 nerve root and the union of the LST with S1 is obscured by the muscle as it attaches medial to the first anterior sacral foramen. Some fibres extend over the second anterior sacral foramen to join true piriformis muscle (P), obscuring the most proximal aspect of the S2 nerve root which then continues anterior to piriformis and inferior to the variant muscle. Co= Coccygeus muscle. OI=Obturator internus. On=Obturator nerve.

journal-anatomical-variations-distal-flattened-tendon

Figure 2: The distal, flattened tendon (white arrows depict superior border) of the right-sided variant muscle is shown fanning out and inserting on the posterior hip joint capsule deep to the sciatic nerve (*) and short external rotators of the hip. Piriformis (P), superior gemellus (SG), obturator internus (OI) and inferior gemellus (IG) have been reflected to open up the region. The acetabular rim is indicated by the white dotted line and the inferior aspect of the greater sciatic foramen is indicated by the black dotted line. QF = Quadratus femoris.

Knowledge and documentation of variant anatomy is vital to further our understanding of human anatomy and its potential to impact clinical outcomes. After a comprehensive literature review we determined that this variant has never been documented before. Despite the wealth of detail presented in “Bergman’s comprehensive encyclopaedia of human anatomic variations” [4] there seems to be only one paper to date that documents a case of a variant piriformis inserting onto the posterior hip joint capsule [1]. This case differs from the present study however by the fact that the variant muscle originated from the postero-superior GSF, not the sacrum, and compressed the superior gluteal nerve. The authors consequently implicated the potential of this variant muscle to cause neuropathic pain as well as to influence hip joint mechanics by exerting tension on the joint capsule.

As in Tubbs and Salter [1], we posit that this muscle may have exerted tension on the posterior joint capsule as it lacked other bony insertion and also that it may have compressed the underlying sacral plexus, although this was not evident in the cadaver’s medical records. This notion of this function may further be supported by the somewhat similar muscle iliocapsularis which has been said to play a role in hip joint stability by exerting tension on the joint capsule to which it originates [5-7]. On the left side, lack of a distinct tendon may indicate that the muscle was not truly functional.

Discussion & Conclusion

Similar cases with slips of piriformis originating medial to the anterior sacral formina exist [8-10], but they are all located at normal vertebral levels corresponding with the piriformis origin (S2-4) and have not been associated with abnormal distal insertions. Smoll and Ebrall [9] noted for the first time grey rami communicantes piercing through the variant anterior slips of piriformis but it was unfortunately not possible to observe this detail in our study.

Origin as high up the sacrum as we found is not reported in the literature as far as we know for piriformis variants and embryological information for piriformis is sparse making it difficult to draw correlation to precursor structures. Furthermore, whilst the literature provides numerous examples of variations in muscle belly number and their distal insertion points, especially in conjunction with sciatic nerve variations and piriformis syndrome [11-13], there seems to be a paucity of detail when it comes to reporting the specifics of the proximal origin and many authors and textbooks remain somewhat vague when it comes to stating exactly where piriformis originates on the sacrum. Studies that do state variation in proximal origin are often wildly atypical forms, such as those of Prasad et al [14] and Tubbs and Salter [1] which originated on the GSF and had no sacral attachment or that of Ravinandrath et al [15] where accessory slips were noted in three cadavers originating from the sacrotuberous ligament with or without attachment to the facia over gluteus medius. We suggest that a detailed study of the sacral attachment of piriformis would be of academic value for clarifying its morphology and variability, and in cases of duplicated or triplicated muscle bellies we suggest that detail of their exact origin be investigated if possible.

References

 

+44 1202068036

Top