44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
International Journal of Anatomical Variations

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Natalisa Hvizdosova*
 
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Slovak republic, Email: natalisa.hvizdosova@upjs.sk
 
*Correspondence: Natalisa Hvizdosova, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University in Kosice, Slovak republic, Email: natalisa.hvizdosova@upjs.sk

Received: 28-Feb-2023, Manuscript No. ijav-23-6236; Editor assigned: 01-Mar-2023, Pre QC No. ijav-23-6236 (PQ); Accepted Date: Mar 21, 2023; Reviewed: 14-Mar-2023 QC No. ijav-23-6236; Revised: 21-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. ijav-23-6236 (R); Published: 28-Mar-2023, DOI: 10.37532/1308-4038.16(3).246

Citation: Hvizdosova N. Navigating Complex Surgical Anatomy: A Case Report. Int J Anat Var. 2023;16(3):265-266.

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com

Abstract

The success of surgical procedures depends on a comprehensive understanding of the anatomical structures involved. However, in some cases, the surgical anatomy can be complex, posing challenges for the surgical team. In this case report, we present a case of a 56-year-old male who underwent a surgical procedure for a tumor located in a challenging anatomical location. The surgery required an in-depth knowledge of the anatomy of the surrounding structures and a meticulous surgical approach to avoid damage to vital structures. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough understanding of surgical anatomy, careful preoperative planning, and a multidisciplinary team approach to achieve successful outcomes in complex surgical cases.

Keywords

Surgical Anatomy; Neuroanesthesiologist; Neurosurgeon; Motor evoked potentials

INTRODUCTION

Surgical procedures require an intricate knowledge of the anatomy of the structures involved. While modern imaging techniques have improved the accuracy of preoperative planning, complex surgical anatomy can still pose significant challenges to the surgical team. A detailed understanding of the anatomy of the structures involved is crucial to ensure a safe and successful surgical outcome. In this case report, we present a case of a challenging surgical anatomy and the surgical approach used to navigate it. Navigating complex surgical anatomy is an important skill for surgeons, as it involves the ability to understand and manipulate intricate structures within the human body. Surgical procedures often require the surgeon to navigate through complex anatomy in order to reach the target organ or tissue and perform the necessary procedure [1].

To navigate complex surgical anatomy, surgeons must have a strong understanding of the human anatomy, including the location, function, and relationship between different organs and tissues. They must also possess technical skills and dexterity, as well as the ability to think critically and make quick decisions in high-pressure situations [2-3]. In addition to traditional surgical techniques, new technologies such as computer-assisted navigation systems and virtual reality simulations are emerging as tools to aid surgeons in navigating complex anatomy. These technologies can provide enhanced visualization and precision, allowing for more accurate and less invasive procedures.

Overall, navigating complex surgical anatomy is a challenging but essential component of surgical practice, requiring a combination of anatomical knowledge, technical skills, and innovation.

CASE REPORT

A 56-year-old male presented with a tumor located in the cerebellopontine angle, a challenging anatomical location due to the presence of critical structures such as the cranial nerves, blood vessels, and brainstem. The patient underwent preoperative imaging, which revealed the size and location of the tumor and the surrounding structures. The surgical team, consisting of a neurosurgeon, neuroanesthesiologist, and neurophysiologist, conducted a thorough preoperative planning session to discuss the surgical approach and the potential risks associated with the surgery [4-5] (Figure 1).

international-journal-located

Figure 1: Tumor located in the cerebellopontine angle a challenging anatomical location.

During the surgery, the team used intraoperative monitoring techniques, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs), to ensure the safety of the surrounding structures. The neurosurgeon used a meticulous surgical approach to access the tumor, carefully dissecting the surrounding structures while avoiding damage to the cranial nerves and blood vessels. The surgery was successful, and the patient had no postoperative complications [6].

CONCLUSION

The success of surgical procedures depends on a comprehensive understanding of the anatomy of the structures involved. In complex surgical cases, preoperative planning and a multidisciplinary team approach are crucial to ensure a safe and successful outcome. This case report highlights the importance of a thorough understanding of surgical anatomy, careful preoperative planning, and a meticulous surgical approach in navigating complex surgical anatomy [7-9].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

None

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:

None.

References

  1. Kay LW. Some anthropologic investigations of interest to oral surgeons. Int J Oral Surg. 1974; 3(6):363-79.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Agthong S, Huanmanop T, Chentanez V. Anatomical variation of the supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63(6):800-804.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, et al. Characteristics of accessory mental foramina observed on limited cone-beam computed tomography images. J Endod. 2008; 34(12):1441-1445.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella RA. A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxil-lofac Implants. 1994; 9:455-468.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar

  9. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, et al. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(2):289-294.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Laurent de K, Stefano M. Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 37(11):9-828.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Jun S, Zhang-Y, Chuan C. Postoperative neovascularization, cerebral hemodynamics, and clinical prognosis between combined and indirect bypass revascularization procedures in hemorrhagic moyamoya disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Sep; 208:106869.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Qi L, Xiaojie T, Yafang D. Evaluation of Carotid Plaque Rupture and Neovascularization by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: an Exploratory Study Based on Histopathology. Transl Stroke Res. 2021 Feb; 12(1):49-56.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Kuo-Shyang J, Shu-Sheng L, Chiung-FC. The Role of Endoglin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 22;22(6):3208
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

 
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 2426

International Journal of Anatomical Variations received 2426 citations as per Google Scholar report

International Journal of Anatomical Variations peer review process verified at publons
pulsus-health-tech
Top