44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Rebecca James*
 
Editorial Office, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Windsor, United Kingdom, Email: clinicalmicro@scienceresearchpub.org
 
*Correspondence: Rebecca James, Editorial Office, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Windsor, United Kingdom, Email: clinicalmicro@scienceresearchpub.org

Received: 17-Jun-2022, Manuscript No. PULJCMID-22-5255; Editor assigned: 20-Jun-2022, Pre QC No. PULJCMID-22-5255(PQ); Reviewed: 28-Jun-2022 QC No. PULJCMID-22-5255(Q); Revised: 05-Jul-2022, Manuscript No. PULJCMID-22-5255(R); Published: 22-Jul-2022, DOI: 10.37532/ puljcmid.2022.5(4).34-35

Citation: James R. Regulation of the production of fungal cell walls post transcriptionally. J Clin microbiol Infect Dis. 2022; 5(4):34-35.

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com

Abstract

By coating immunogenic cell wall components like β-glucan with harmless coverings like mannoproteins and α-glucan that the host is less likely to recognize, pathogenic fungi conceal themselves from their hosts. The success of efforts to comprehend how such processes are controlled has varied. Studies often concentrate on comprehending how fungi respond transcriptionally to either their reservoir environment or the host. However, because of the levels of post-transcriptional and posttranslational regulation that take place within a cell, such techniques do not completely address this study subject. Although the effects of posttranscriptional and post-translational regulation have been extensively studied in mammals, we know less about these mechanisms in the kingdom of fungi. Mutations in RNA-binding proteins, such as Candida albicans Slr1 and Ssd1, impact the structure of the cell wall and the pathogenicity of the fungus, demonstrating the importance of posttranscriptional control in these processes. By using research on model yeast and plant pathogenic fungi, we examine the present state of knowledge on fungal post-transcriptional regulation and relate it to putative immune evasion mechanisms. We focus on several RNA-binding proteins that control the production of cell walls and could be involved in the local translation of cell wall constituents. To fully understand fungal virulence mechanisms and for the development of innovative antifungal medicines, it is crucial to increase our understanding of posttranscriptional regulation in human fungal infections.

Key Words

Cardiac rehabilitation; Core components; Guidelines; Heart valve surgery; Heart valve replacement

Introduction

The multi-layered, active fungal cell wall is made up of proteins and polysaccharides. The inner skeletal layer of chitin and β-glucan form the exoskeleton of the cell and maintains cell shape, rigidity, and turgor pressure. The outer layer of the cell wall is formed of glycosylated mannoproteins, which provide specific cell functions like adhesion and invasion. The composition of the cell wall varies from species to species. When the cell wall is under stress, several transcriptional pathways mount defensive reactions. A core set of cell wall biosynthesis genes are upregulated when the Protein Kinase C (PKC) signaling pathway, which is triggered by the Cell Wall Integrity (CWI) pathway as well as additional pathways like the HOG1 and calcium-calcineurin pathway, is active through membrane receptors. Histone modifications and transcription factors can control how genes are expressed at the transcriptional level. Non-coding RNAs, upstream open reading frames, RNA binding proteins, mRNA localization factors, and mRNA decay machinery can control gene expression post-transcriptionally. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the regulation of cell wall biosynthesis due to the role of post-transcriptional regulation, despite the wealth of information provided by global transcriptional approaches on how genes involved in cell wall biogenesis are differentially regulated in response to various growth and stress conditions.

Alterations to virulence, immunological recognition, and cell wall biosynthesis will occur as a result of the deletion of crucial regulatory units. Deletion of RNA binding proteins involved in the control of cell wall production causes morphological abnormalities, which reduce pathogenicity since cell wall remodeling is necessary for fungal morphogenesis. Aberrant cell wall production can also result in increased PAMP exposure, which can increase Dectin-1 dependent recognition of β-glucan and promote pathogen clearance, similar to what happens when numerous glycosyltransferases are deleted. According to recent advances in crosslinking and proteomic methods, around a sixth of the genome's encoded proteins bind RNA, the majority of which are probably involved in post-transcriptional gene regulation. There is currently little understanding of the functions orthologues of these regulatory proteins perform in pathogenic or filamentous fungus since practically all published information on fungal RNA binding proteins is from S. cerevisiae.

We believe that filamentous fungus will have unique RNA-binding proteins that are lacking from S. cerevisiae since they have bigger genomes than yeasts do. Therefore, the significance posttranscriptional regulation plays in cell wall biosynthesis and pathogenicity in fungi is currently greatly underestimated. Genetic screens may be used to find RBPs that have an impact on cell walls, proliferation, and virulence. This paper makes the case that RBPs should be followed up on in similar screening procedures much like transcription factors, protein kinases, and other "usual suspects." RBPs can benefit from in-depth follow-up using molecular genetics, cell biology, structural biology, and other fields of biology.

Characterizing protein interaction partners, in particular, will shed light on the operation and control of RBPs. Beyond looking for symptoms of whole-gene deletions, planned alterations to RNAbinding domains and phosphorylation sites will probably be particularly instructive given that RBPs bind RNA and are frequently controlled by kinases. In conclusion, there is a lot of room for further research into the roles that RNA-binding proteins and localized translation play in fungus. Major findings are probably still to come on the many roles played by post-transcriptional regulation in the regulation of cell walls, environmental responses, and host evasion.

 
pulsus-health-tech
Top