44 2033180199
All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Anesthesiology Case Reports

Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up

Ankit Pandey1*, Vikas Yadav2 and Deepti Pathak3
 
1 Department of Biotechnology, IBST, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow,UP, India, Email: ankit_pandey@gmail.com
2 Department of Pharmacy, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida, UP, India
3 Department of Biotechnology, Delhi University, Delhi, India
 
*Correspondence: Ankit Pandey, Department of Biotechnology, IBST, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow,UP, India, Email: ankit_pandey@gmail.com

Received: 08-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. pulacr-22-5555; Editor assigned: 12-Sep-2022, Pre QC No. pulacr-22-5555 (PQ); Accepted Date: Sep 29, 2022; Reviewed: 26-Sep-2022 QC No. pulacr-22-5555 (Q); Revised: 28-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. pulacr-22-5555 (R); Published: 30-Sep-2022, DOI: 10.37532.puldcr-22.5.5.9-10

Citation: Pandey A, Yadav V, Pathak D. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general and thoracic spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiol Case Rep. 2022; 5(5):9-10.

This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact reprints@pulsus.com

Abstract

Although general anesthesia is typically used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, many individuals with serious medical conditions occasionally find that they are unable to tolerate it. In these cases, thoracic spinal anesthesia may be helpful. Under spinal anesthetic and low-pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely completed. In comparison to lumbar spinal anesthesia with normal doses, the use of thoracic puncture and modest doses of hyperbaric bupivacaine resulted in greater hemodynamic stability, less hypotension, and a shorter period of sensory and motor blockage.

Keywords

Regional anesthetic; Spinal anesthesia; Combined spinal epidural; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Cardiac illness

Introduction

Several surgeons now routinely perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which Phillipe Mouret pioneered in 1987 [1,2]. This approach, which is far less invasive than earlier open surgery, provides advantages like reduced pain, a shorter hospital stay since less tissue damage occurs, and a quicker return to normal activities because of a quick recovery [3]. However, significant challenges in anesthetic administration may arise because pneumoperitoneum and position changes can cause extensive hemodynamic fluctuation. Due to CO2 absorption and an increase in venous return brought on by pneumoperitoneum, these effects are felt throughout the body [4]. Initial CO2 absorption causes a rise in the gas's elimination in exhaled air, arterial blood, and venous blood [5,6]. By causing metabolic and respiratory acidosis, this carboxamide lowers arterial and mixed venous pH as well as arterial PO2 [5]. In contrast to inert gases like helium and argon, absorption of CO2 has a deleterious impact on respiratory function [6]. The following parameters all rise: minute ventilation, peak inspiratory pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, estimated physiological short circuit, alveolar CO2 concentration, central venous pressure, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and cardiac index [4].

Effect of regional anesthetic

The surgical stress response is decreased during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the regional anesthetic. No airway instrumentation and a low incidence of deep vein thrombosis are present during regional anesthesia [7]. Despite this, because of the severe thoracic nerve block, regional anesthetic runs the risk of causing insufficient breathing. Due to its innervation at the cervical level and the fact that expiration is typically a passive process, the diaphragm, which is the primary inspiratory muscle, will be untouched. However, as they are predominantly produced by the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall, which are innervated by the thoracic nerves, vigorous expiration and coughing will be impacted. 

Regulation of the CO2 concentration

In patients with obstructive airway disease, which depends on vigorous expiration to sustain lung ventilation, the use of relatively large doses of local anesthetics can have devastating results. By employing an adequate dose of local anesthetics, it is therefore important to reduce the degree of nerve block and muscular paralysis. Controlling the pneumoperitoneal pressure precisely during surgery to guarantee appropriate diaphragmatic excursion is another issue. Because CO2 insufflation can create pneumoperitoneum and stimulate the vagal nerve, which can reduce the heart rate, it is important to inhale CO2 gently and keep the maximum intraabdominal pressure below 14 mmHg. Numerous studies have looked into the detrimental effects of pneumoperitoneum with CO2 on respiratory function [8]. Due to its high water solubility and a great capacity for exchange in the lungs, CO2 is typically employed for safety. By using capnography and ventilation, it is simple to monitor and regulate the CO2 concentration [9].

Thoracic spinal anesthesia can be safe for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients without associated respiratory depression because the respiratory control mechanism is still intact and allows patients to adjust their minute ventilation. SpO2 and PETCO2 remained within normal limits (no hypoxemia or retention of CO2) throughout the procedure. When reduced intraabdominal pressure and minimal patient tilt are employed during the surgical operation, it appears that regional anesthesia may be an alternative to general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cardiac illness [10].

Discussion

At the low thoracic level, the Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE) method was carried out without too much trouble. The 2nd sacral nerve roots to 5th sacral nerve roots are located in the dural sac at L3- L4, which is the typical location for lumbar puncture. It is simple to comprehend why the thoracic puncture causes lumbar paresthesia given that the lower nerves are of higher origin and that the lumbar nerves originate from a thoracic level (L1–S4). Two patients did feel some paresthesia when the spinal needle was first inserted, but these symptoms went away when the needle was removed and did not cause any postoperative sequelae. Any approach of spinal anesthesia can cause paresthesia, but they have the potential to be more significant when the needle is put above the spinal cord's termination. The risk of contact with neural tissue should be reduced if a CSE system is used, as it is here, to limit the length of the needle that can extend past the tip of the epidural needle. However, the presence of paresthesia in two patients suggested that this could be important. When low thoracic spinal needles were inserted, noticed a 6.6% incidence of paresthesia without any long-term neurologic damage [11].

References

 
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 8

Anesthesiology Case Reports received 8 citations as per Google Scholar report

pulsus-health-tech
Top