Sign up for email alert when new content gets added: Sign up
Duties of Authors
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors ought to make sure that they need written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others this should be fitly cited or quoted. Such quotations and citations should be listed within the Reference at the top of the article.
Multiple Publications: AN author shouldn't generally publish manuscripts describing primarily constant analysis in additional than one journal or primary publication. Submitting constant manuscript to over one journal at the same time constitutes unethical business enterprise behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources: correct acknowledgment of the work of others should incline. Authors ought to cite publications that are potent in determinative the character of the rumoured work.
Authorship of the Paper: Authorship ought to be restricted to people who have created a major contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study, and will be listed as co-authors. Others, WHO have participated in sure substantive aspects of the scientific research, ought to be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
Corresponding Author: Corresponding author is that the author answerable for human activity with the journal for publication. The corresponding author ought to make sure that all applicable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are enclosed on the paper. All co-authors have seen and approved the ultimate version of the paper and have united to its submission for publication.
Acknowledgment of Funding Sources: Sources of funding for the analysis rumoured within the article ought to be punctually acknowledged at the top of the article.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors ought to disclose in their manuscript any monetary or alternative substantive conflict of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
Fundamental Errors in printed Works: Once AN author discovers a major error or quality in his/her own printed work, it's the author’s obligation to promptly inform the journal editors or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Duties of Reviewers
Contribution of critique: critique assists the editors in creating editorial choices whereas editorial communications with the author can also assist the author in raising the paper.
Unqualified to Review or Promptness: Any reviewer WHO feels unqualified to review the allotted manuscript or unable to supply a prompt review ought to inform the editors and excuse him/her from the review method.
Confidentiality: Manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. they need to not be shown to, or mentioned with, others except as licensed by the chief editors. Privileged data or ideas obtained through critique should be unbroken confidential and not used for private advantage.
Standards of sound judgment: Reviews ought to be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers ought to categorical their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers ought to determine relevant printed work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that had been antecedent reported elsewhere ought to be in the middle of the relevant citation. A reviewer ought to conjointly decision to the chief editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript into consideration and the other printed paper of that they need personal information.
Conflict of Interest: Reviewers ought to decline to review manuscripts during which they need conflicts of interest ensuing from competitive, cooperative, or alternative relationships or connections with any of the authors.
Duties of Editors
Decision on the Publication of Articles: The editors of Revues are answerable for deciding that of the articles submitted to the journal ought to be printed. The editors could also be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board subjected to such legal necessities concerning libel, infringement and plagiarism. The editors might check with reviewers in creating this call. Even in cases wherever peer reviews are positive, the editors might decline to publish the paper or give the author with additional comments on the way to modify the article. Ought to the ultimate version not win over the editors, its publication should be rejected. The ultimate call concerning the publication lies with the editors.
Fair Play: Manuscripts shall be evaluated entirely on their intellectual benefit.
Confidentiality: The editors and any editorial employees should not disclose any info a couple of submitted manuscript to anyone aside from the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, different editorial advisers, and also the publisher.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed during a submitted manuscript should not be employed by anyone WHO contains a read of the manuscript whereas handling it in his or her own analysis while not the specific written consent of the author.
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Neuroscience received 500 citations as per Google Scholar report