Return to Table of Contents
379
AMLODIPINE VS LOSARTAN IN THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH AMBULATORY HYPERTENSION AND NORMOALBUMINURIA OR MICROALBUMINURIA: A 3-YEAR ANALYSIS
L Poirier, Y Lacourcičre
Quebec, Quebec
OBJECTIVE: To compare in a double-blind study, the long-term effects of an amlodipine (AML)- based and a losartan (LOS)- based treatment on blood pressure (BP) reduction, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and renal function in type 2 diabetic patients with ambulatory hypertension and normoalbuminuria (NA, n=47) or microalbuminuria (MA, n=47).
METHODS: Patients with elevated clinic BP and ambulatory daytime BP
RESULTS: Both treatment groups exhibited significant and similar decreases in systolic/diastolic clinic (@ –25/–15 mm Hg) BP. Systolic/ diastolic ambulatory BP were also significantly reduced by both treatments during the daytime (@ –20/-13 mm Hg) and the night-time (@ –14/-9 mm Hg) periods. UAE was similarly decreased by both AML-based (from 26.47 to 16.26 µg/min) and LOS-based (from 16.46 to 7.46 µg/min) treatment regimens. Five NA patients (3 on AML, 2 on LOS) developed MA while one patient (AML group) developed MA. In contrast, 9 out of 25 patients and 9 out of 16 patients respectively treated with AML and LOS regressed to NA from MA. GFR was significantly decreased by both AML (from 98.4±2.6 to 91.3±3.3 ml/min) and LOS (from 94.1±2.6 to 83.0±3.5 ml/min) regimens during the first 24 weeks of treatment but remained stable thereafter.
CONCLUSION: The results of the present study allow us to conclude that an AML-based treatment is as effective as a LOS-based treatment in delaying the occurrence of MA and in the regression to NA in ambulatory hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. period of the 24-hour interval.
DNC